It is late in the afternoon and you are stressed by the number of issues still to be addressed before you call it a day. The telephone rings, you recognize the caller ID (a CEO with one of the companies in which you have invested) and so you answer the telephone.
"There is something I need you to do," he says. "I apologize for the short notice, but I need your consent on some funding that I have negotiated. And it needs to be signed today!"
Let's look at the different perspectives of the two individuals. The CEO has been working hard to secure funding for a key project or entry into a market. He believes that he has secured the best deal. He knows what is going on in the company - he has all of the information.
A couple of years ago you invested a relatively large sum of money, believing that this entrepreneur could successfully enter a new market with a new product. You have heard nothing since the annual meeting. You are essentially void of information in this fast-moving market.
He needs your signature; you need information about what is happening, what it means and how your investment will be prioritized after new investors come on board. Your questions may be interpreted by the CEO as doubts about his work and the integrity of the deal. He may seem confrontational as he does not understand why you will not just sign the consent.
The above scenario is played out all too often between investors and entrepreneurs. We must sometimes back away from the issue at hand and remind ourselves that we are most often on the same side of the table, wanting what is best for the company. The issue is not the funding or the personalities; it is a lack of information brought on by poor communication.
Let's take a look at what is needed by both the entrepreneur and the investor.