|
I'm about ready to concede. I frequently have debates with colleagues
about whether or not a new business idea will fly. I tend to focus on
the idea, while a couple of my colleagues assert that the idea is almost
irrelevant. As far as they are concerned, the only thing that matters
is the person behind the idea.
And I have to admit they have a lot of evidence to support their
position.
I have seen ideas that I thought were fantastic — new technology, patent
protection, dramatic benefits to customers, low capital needs, everything — that
evolved into a business that crashed and burned. And I've seen ideas that I thought
were crummy — easily copied, no new technology, no patents or copyrights,
high marketing costs, and entering markets with lots of competitors — that
did incredibly well entrepreneurially.
Look at the list of the 100 hottest new companies in Entrepreneur
magazine. They include a backpack company, a children's furniture store,
a mortgage company,
a car-armoring business and lots of other companies that would seem to be simply "me
too" ideas against large, entrenched competitors. But somehow they pulled
it off.
I have read many studies indicating the major factors that predict
success, and the lists look very reasonable: sufficient capital, new
market with new idea,
experience and relationships in the market by the entrepreneur, barriers to new
competitors, credible marketing plan, etc. But I have also seen companies that
seem to fit every factor perfectly — and still don't make it.
I guess I am coming over to the belief that the most critical
variable is the hardest to measure and quantify: the personality
traits, skills and character
of the entrepreneur. If you are investing in a business, it is primarily a
bet on the entrepreneur. |