TRM Standards

The learning outcomes, performance measures, quality assessment measures, and performance standards are detailed below for the therapeutic recreation and management program.

Professional Practice: Students graduating from the program shall demonstrate entry-level knowledge of the nature and scope of the therapeutic recreation.

Accreditation Standard Evidences of Meeting Standards
7.01.01
Learning Opportunity
RECM 470 Syllabus, Assignment Prompts
RECM 472 Syllabus, Assignment Prompts
Performance Measures
Items used to measure the outcomes; at least two needed with one being direct.
RECM 470 Final Project
RECM 472 Evidence-Based Assignment
7.01.02
Quality Assessment Measures
Evidence of content & criterion validity
RECM 470 Final Project: Academic peer review, faculty-reviewed item and grading rubrics.
RECM 472 Evidence-Based Assignment: Academic peer review, initial review on 8 February 2013 and additional review on 10 January 2014, reviewed assignment and grading rubrics.
Performance Levels RECM 470 Final Project: Class average 94 percent with 21 of 22 over 80 percent.
RECM 472 Evidence-Based Assignment: Average score for content aspects of this assignment of 85 percent or better.

Processes and Techniques: Students graduating from the program shall demonstrate entry-level knowledge of the nature and scope of the therapeutic recreation.

Accreditation Standard Evidences of Meeting Standards
7.01.01
Learning Opportunity
RECM 470 Syllabus, Assignment Prompts
RECM 471 Syllabus, Assignment Prompts
RECM 473 Syllabus, Assignment Prompts
Performance Measures
Items used to measure the outcomes; at least two needed with one being direct.
RECM 470 Final Project
RECM 471 Group Project
RECM 473 Written Plan of Operations
7.01.02
Quality Assessment Measures
How was content and criterion validity of measure established, or how was the quality of measure established?
Academic Peer Review: Review on 10 January 2014, reviewed assignments and grading rubrics.
Performance Levels RECM 470 Final Project Final Project: Score of 80 percent or better.
RECM 471 Group Project Group: Program plan 80 percent or better.
RECM 473 Written Plan of Operations: Score of 80 percent or better.

The foundation of the profession in history, science, theory, and philosophy.

Accreditation Standard Evidences of Meeting Standards
7.01.01
Learning Opportunity
RECM 300 Syllabus, Assignment Prompts
RECM 470 Syllabus, Assignment Prompts
Performance Measures
Items used to measure the outcomes; at least two needed with one being direct.
RECM 300 Exam Items
RECM 470 Exam I
7.01.02
Quality Assessment Measures
How was content and criterion validity of measure established, or how was the quality of measure established?
RECM 300 Exam Items: See EIM outcome measures reports
RECM 470 Exam I: Academic peer review. Initial review 8 February 2013, review 10 January 2014. Reviewed items and grading rubrics.
Performance Levels RECM 300: Average score for all items of 80 percent or better.
RECM 470: 80 percent or better.

Assessment: Students graduating from the program shall demonstrate the ability to assess, plan, implement, document, and evaluate therapeutic recreation services that facilitate targeted outcomes and that embrace personal and cultural dimensions of diversity.

Accreditation Standard Evidences of Meeting Standards
7.02a.01
Learning Opportunity
RECM 471 Syllabus, Assignment Prompts
Performance Measures
Items used to measure the outcomes; at least two needed with one being direct.
RECM 471 Assessment Paper
RECM 471 Final Exam
7.02a.02
Quality Assessment Measures
How was content and criterion validity of measure established, or how was the quality of measure established?
RECM 471 Assessment Paper: Academic peer review. Initial review 8 February 2013, review 10 January 2014. Reviewed items and grading rubrics.
RECM 471 Final Exam: Academic peer review. Initial review 8 February 2013, review 10 January 2014. Reviewed items and grading rubrics.
Performance Levels RECM 471 Assessment Paper: 80 percent or better.
RECM 471 Final Exam: 80 percent or better.

Program Planning: Students graduating from the program shall demonstrate the ability to assess, plan, implement, document, and evaluate therapeutic recreation services that facilitate targeted outcomes and that embrace personal and cultural dimensions of diversity.

Accreditation Standard Evidences of Meeting Standards
7.02b.01
Learning Opportunity
RECM 471 Syllabus, Assignment Prompts
RECM 472 Syllabus, Assignment Prompts
Performance Measures
Items used to measure the outcomes; at least two needed with one being direct.
RECM 471 Individualized Program Plan
RECM 472 Goals and Objectives Assignment
7.02b.02
Quality Assessment Measures
How was content and criterion validity of measure established, or how was the quality of measure established?
RECM 471 Individualized Program Plan: Academic peer review. Initial review 8 February 2013, review 10 January 2014. Reviewed items and grading rubrics.
RECM 472 Goals and Objectives Assignment: Academic peer review. Initial review 8 February 2013, review 10 January 2014. Reviewed items and grading rubrics.
Performance Levels RECM 471 Individualized Program Plan: 80 percent or better.
RECM 472 Goals and Objectives Assignment: 80 percent or better.

Implementation and Facilitation: Students graduating from the program shall demonstrate the ability to assess, plan, implement, document, and evaluate therapeutic recreation services that facilitate targeted outcomes and that embrace personal and cultural dimensions of diversity.

Accreditation Standard Evidences of Meeting Standards
7.02c.01
Learning Opportunity
RECM 472 Syllabus, Assignment Prompts
Performance Measures
Items used to measure the outcomes; at least two needed with one being direct.
RECM 472 Activity Analysis and Modification Portion of Evidence-Based Case History
RECM 472 Facilitation Techniques Presentation
7.02c.02
Quality Assessment Measures
How was content and criterion validity of measure established, or how was the quality of measure established?
RECM 472 Activity Analysis and Modification Portion of Evidence-Based Case History: Initial review 8 February 2013, review 10 January 2014. Reviewed items and grading rubrics.
RECM 472 Facilitation Techniques Presentation: Review 10 January 2014, reviewed assignments and grading rubrics.
Performance Levels RECM 472 Activity Analysis and Modification Portion of Evidence-Based Case History: 80 percent or better.
RECM 472 Facilitation Techniques Presentation: 80 percent or better.

Documentation: Students graduating from the program shall demonstrate the ability to assess, plan, implement, document, and evaluate therapeutic recreation services that facilitate targeted outcomes and that embrace personal and cultural dimensions of diversity.

Accreditation Standard Evidences of Meeting Standards
7.02d.01
Learning Opportunity
RECM 473 Syllabus, Assignment Prompts
Performance Measures
Items used to measure the outcomes; at least two needed with one being direct.
RECM 473 Final Project
RECM 473 Exam 1
7.02d.02
Quality Assessment Measures
How was content and criterion validity of measure established, or how was the quality of measure established?
RECM 473 Final Project: Academic peer review. Initial review 8 February 2013, review 10 January 2014. Reviewed items and grading rubrics.
RECM 473 Exam 1: Academic peer review. Initial review 8 February 2013, review 10 January 2014. Reviewed items.
Performance Levels RECM 473 Final Project: 80 percent or better.
RECM 473 Exam 1: 80 percent or better.

Evaluation: Students graduating from the program shall demonstrate the ability to assess, plan, implement, document, and evaluate therapeutic recreation services that facilitate targeted outcomes and that embrace personal and cultural dimensions of diversity.

Accreditation Standard Evidences of Meeting Standards
7.02e.01
Learning Opportunity
RECM 471 Syllabus, Assignment Prompts
RECM 473 Syllabus, Assignment Prompts
Performance Measures
Items used to measure the outcomes; at least two needed with one being direct.
RECM 471 Final Exam
RECM 473 Written Plan of Operations
7.02e.02
Quality Assessment Measures
How was content and criterion validity of measure established, or how was the quality of measure established?
RECM 473 Final Exam: Academic peer review. Initial review 8 February 2013, review 10 January 2014. Reviewed items and grading rubrics.
RECM 473 Written Plan of Operations: Academic peer review. Initial review 8 February 2013, review 10 January 2014. Reviewed items and grading rubrics.
Performance Levels RECM 471 Final Exam: 80 percent or better.
RECM 473 Written Plan of Operations: 80 percent or better.

Students graduating from the program shall be able to demonstrate entry-level knowledge about facts, concepts, principles, and procedures of management/administration in therapeutic recreation.

Accreditation Standard Evidences of Meeting Standards
7.03.01
Learning Opportunity
RECM 472 Syllabus, Assignment Prompts
RECM 473 Syllabus, Assignment Prompts
Performance Measures
Items used to measure the outcomes; at least two needed with one being direct.
RECM 472 EBP Case Study
RECM 473 Written Plan of Operations
7.03.02
Quality Assessment Measures
How was content and criterion validity of measure established, or how was the quality of measure established?
RECM 472 EBP Case Study: Academic peer review. Initial review 8 February 2013, review 10 January 2014. Reviewed items and grading rubrics.
RECM 473 Written Plan of Operations: Academic peer review. Initial review 8 February 2013, review 10 January 2014. Reviewed items and grading rubrics.
Performance Levels RECM 472 EBP Case Study: 80 percent or better.
RECM 473 Written Plan of Operations: 80 percent or better.

Students graduating from the program shall demonstrate, through a comprehensive internship of no less than 560 clock hours and no fewer than fourteen weeks, the potential to succeed as professionals at supervisory or higher levels in therapeutic recreation or related professions.

Accreditation Standard Evidences of Meeting Standards
7.04.01
Learning Opportunity
RECM 496R Syllabus, Assignment Prompts
Performance Measures
Items used to measure the outcomes; at least two needed with one being direct.
RECM 496R Completed IRAMS Internship Application, pass/fail
7.04.02
Quality Assessment Measures
How was content and criterion validity of measure established, or how was the quality of measure established?
RECM 496R: Academic peer review. Initial review 8 February 2013, review 10 January 2014. Reviewed items and grading rubrics.
Performance Levels RECM 496R: Supervisor evaluation, case study, pass/fail.